Research Data Visualization: Best Practices & Tools for Scientists (2026 Guide)

A poorly designed chart can bury your findings. A well-designed one can make them unforgettable.

As Knowable Magazine notes, "The scientific literature is riddled with bad charts and graphs, leading to misunderstanding and worse." Yet data visualization remains one of the most undertaught skills in graduate programs.

This guide covers everything researchers need to create effective, publication-ready visualizations—from fundamental principles to specific tools and techniques.

Why Data Visualization Matters in Research

Before diving into techniques, let's understand what's at stake:

A well-designed ROC curve clearly communicates model performance, making complex statistical concepts accessible to readers

---

The Foundation: Define Your Purpose First

According to Simplified Science Publishing, every visualization should start with a clear purpose. The four main purposes for scientific data visualization are:

1. Explain a process or method
2. Compare or contrast
3. Show change over time
4. Establish relationships

Your purpose determines your chart type. Getting this wrong is the most common visualization mistake.

The Data Purpose Framework

---

Choosing the Right Chart Type

For Categorical Comparisons

Bar Charts remain the workhorse of scientific visualization, but they're often overused. According to the Johns Hopkins Data Visualization Guide, many alternatives provide more information:

• Box plots — Show variability and distribution
• Scatter plots — Reveal sample size, outliers, and clusters
• Violin plots — Combine box plot information with density distribution

Complex relationships like this signaling pathway require thoughtful visualization choices to communicate multiple variables and interactions

For Time Series Data

For Distributions

• Histogram — Single variable distribution
• Density plot — Smoother distribution visualization
• Box plot — Compare distributions across groups
• Violin plot — Distribution shape with statistical summary

For Relationships

• Scatter plot — Two continuous variables
• Bubble chart — Three variables (x, y, size)
• Heat map — Matrix of values across categories
• Network diagram — Connections between entities

---

The Seven Principles of Effective Visualization

The Michigan State University Library Guide identifies seven criteria for judging visualization effectiveness:

1. Usefulness

Does the visualization meet your audience's needs? A figure for journal reviewers differs from one for a conference poster or public presentation.

Ask yourself:

• Who will view this?
• What decision or understanding should it enable?
• What's their technical background?

2. Completeness

Include all necessary information—and nothing more. Every element should serve a purpose.

Must include:

• Clear title describing the finding
• Axis labels with units
• Legend (if multiple series)
• Sample size indicators
• Statistical significance markers

Often unnecessary:

• Gridlines (use sparingly)
• Decorative elements
• 3D effects
• Excessive decimal places

3. Perceptibility

Can viewers understand the visualization with minimal effort? The George Washington University Guide distinguishes between:

• Exploratory visualizations — For your own data analysis
• Explanatory visualizations — For communicating to others

Publication figures should be explanatory—immediately clear to someone seeing them for the first time.

4. Truthfulness

Never distort data to make findings appear more significant. Common distortions to avoid:

5. Intuitiveness

Use familiar conventions. Readers shouldn't need to learn a new visual language to understand your figure.

• Time flows left to right
• Larger = more
• Red = negative/danger, Green = positive (but consider colorblindness)
• Up = increase

6. Aesthetics

Visual appeal matters for engagement. Clean, professional figures signal careful research.

Design tips:

• Consistent color palette throughout paper
• Adequate white space
• Aligned elements
• Professional fonts (see our font guide)

7. Engagement

The best visualizations tell a story. Guide the viewer's eye to your key finding.

---

Using Color Effectively

Color is powerful but frequently misused. The University at Buffalo Data Visualization Guide emphasizes strategic color use.

Color Best Practices

1. Use color to encode meaning, not decoration

Every color should represent something. Random colors confuse readers.

2. Design for colorblindness

Approximately 1 in 12 men and 1 in 200 women have some form of color vision deficiency. Tools for creating accessible palettes:

• ColorBrewer — Colorblind-safe palettes
• Viz Palette — Test palettes for accessibility
• Color Safe — WCAG-compliant combinations

3. Ensure print compatibility

Many journals still print in grayscale. Test your figures in black and white.

4. Limit your palette

3-5 colors maximum. More creates visual noise.

For detailed guidance, see our scientific color palette guide.

This enzyme mechanism uses color strategically—different colors distinguish substrate, enzyme, and products while maintaining accessibility

---

Eliminating Chartjunk

Edward Tufte coined the term "chartjunk" for visual elements that don't contribute to understanding. Ruthlessly eliminate:

The Data-Ink Ratio

Tufte advocates maximizing the "data-ink ratio"—the proportion of ink devoted to displaying data versus non-data elements. Higher is better.

Before: Heavy gridlines, 3D bars, gradient fills, decorative border After: Clean bars, minimal gridlines, clear labels, white space

---

Journal Requirements and Specifications

Before creating figures, check your target journal's requirements. Common specifications:

Figure Dimensions

Resolution Requirements

• Line art: 1000-1200 DPI
• Halftones (photos): 300 DPI minimum
• Combination: 500-600 DPI

File Formats

Most journals accept:

• TIFF — Preferred for final submission
• EPS — Vector graphics
• PDF — Some journals
• PNG — Web versions

For comprehensive journal figure guidelines, see our guide on making figures for Nature, Science, and Cell.

---

Free Tools for Research Data Visualization

General-Purpose Tools

Statistical & Scientific Tools

Network & Specialized Tools

Data Preparation

---

Step-by-Step: Creating Publication-Ready Figures

Step 1: Plan Your Figure

Before opening any software:

1. Define the message — What should readers take away?
2. Choose chart type — Based on data purpose
3. Sketch layout — Rough paper sketch helps
4. Check journal specs — Dimensions, format, color

Step 2: Prepare Your Data

• Clean and organize data
• Calculate summary statistics
• Identify outliers
• Format for your chosen tool

Step 3: Create Initial Visualization

• Start with defaults
• Focus on accuracy first
• Get the data displayed correctly

Step 4: Refine Design

Apply best practices:

• Remove chartjunk
• Add clear labels
• Apply accessible colors
• Ensure adequate contrast

Step 5: Add Context

• Descriptive title
• Axis labels with units
• Legend if needed
• Statistical annotations

Step 6: Export and Test

• Export at required resolution
• Test at actual print size
• Check grayscale version
• Verify on different screens

---

Multi-Panel Figures

Complex research often requires multi-panel figures. Best practices:

Layout Principles

• Consistent sizing — Panels should be comparable
• Clear labeling — A, B, C labels in consistent position
• Logical flow — Left-to-right, top-to-bottom
• Shared legends — Avoid redundancy

Panel Labels

Alignment

• Align axes across panels when possible
• Use consistent scales for comparison
• Match color coding across panels

---

Common Mistakes and How to Fix Them

Mistake 1: Wrong Chart Type

Problem: Using a pie chart to show changes over time Fix: Match chart type to data purpose (use line chart for trends)

Mistake 2: Overcrowded Figures

Problem: Too much information in one figure Fix: Split into multiple panels or separate figures

Mistake 3: Missing Error Bars

Problem: No indication of variability Fix: Always show standard deviation, standard error, or confidence intervals

Mistake 4: Inconsistent Styling

Problem: Different fonts, colors, styles across figures Fix: Create a style template and apply consistently

Mistake 5: Low Resolution

Problem: Pixelated figures in final publication Fix: Work at publication resolution from the start

Medical diagrams require particular attention to accuracy and clarity—each element must be precisely positioned and labeled

---

Frequently Asked Questions

---

Conclusion

Effective data visualization is a skill that distinguishes impactful research from overlooked findings. The principles are straightforward:

1. Define your purpose before choosing a chart type
2. Choose the right visualization for your data and message
3. Apply design best practices — eliminate chartjunk, use color strategically
4. Ensure accessibility — colorblind-safe palettes, grayscale compatibility
5. Meet technical requirements — resolution, dimensions, file formats
6. Tell a story — guide readers to your key findings

Remember: your visualizations should make complex findings clear, not showcase technical complexity. The best figure is one that readers understand immediately.

---

Additional Resources

• Johns Hopkins Data Visualization Guide
• George Washington University DataViz Best Practices
• PLOS Computational Biology: Ten Simple Rules for Better Figures
• How to Make Figures for Nature, Science, Cell
• Scientific Color Palette Guide
• Best Fonts for Scientific Figures
• How to Create a Graphical Abstract

Ready to create stunning research visualizations? Try ConceptViz to generate professional scientific diagrams from simple text descriptions.